基础与临床研究 >文章正文
基础与临床研究 >文章正文
A Comparative Study of Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia with Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Cesarean Section <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 赵普文 施永平 余大松 中国福利会国际和平妇幼保健院麻醉科,上海 200030 Puwen Zhao, Yongping Shi and Dasong Yu The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital of the China Welfare Institute, Shanghai, 200030 Objective: To investigate dose-response relationship of ropivacaine for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in cesarean section, and to determine the effects of ropivacaine for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia on the cardiovascular system and side-effects as compared with bupivacaine. Methods: 120 primiparae (ASAⅠ-Ⅱ) scheduled for elective cesarean section were divided into four groups: group Ⅰ(n=30) received ropivacaine 9mgml-1 for spinal anesthesia; group Ⅱ(n=30) received ropivacaine 12mgml-1 for spinal anesthesia; group Ⅲ(n=30) received ropivacaine 15mgml-1 for spinal anesthesia; group Ⅳ(n=30) received bupivacaine 10mgml-1 for spinal anesthesia. During operation when spinal analgesia was inadequate, 2% lidocaine was supplemented via epidural catheter. Blood pressure, heart rate and SpO2 were monitored. The onset time of analgesia, the height of sensory block(pin prick), Apgar score for neonates and side-effects were recorded. Results: Among the four groups ,the age, height, weight, pregnant weeks were similar before the operation(p>0.05). The MAP was declined among the four groups after anesthesia. There was no significant difference in MAP during anesthesia on same time among the four groups(p>0.05). The onset time of analgesia and the height of sensory block were similar among the four groups. The effect of anesthesia was satisfied for groupⅡ,Ⅲ,Ⅳ. There were 8 patients to require 2% lidocaine(6.75±1.62ml) via epidural catheter in group Ⅰ because the spinal analgesia was inadequate. The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia were not statistically significant among the four groups. The incidence of nausea and vomit were significantly higher in groupⅢ than that in groupⅠand Ⅱ. Conclusions: The anesthetic efficacy of 12mg, 15mg ropivacaine were similar with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in cesarean section as compared with 10mg bupivacaine.The dosage of ropivacaine didn't affecte the onset time of analgesia and the height of sensory block for spinal. Key words: Ropivacaine; Bupivacaine; Combined Spinal-epidual Anesthesia; Cesarean Section Corresponding author: Puwen Zhao, MD; zhaopw2002@yahoo.com.cn 本文旨在探讨腰-硬联合麻醉下剖宫产术,罗哌卡因随剂量增加的麻醉量效关系、对循环的影响和不良反应及其与老局麻药布比卡因在这几方面的比较。 |
资料与方法 |
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 在麻醉质量方面 ,12mg ,15mg 罗哌卡因与10mg布比卡因在腰麻下行剖宫产术的麻醉效能相近,三组产妇的麻醉镇痛效果均满意,而9mg罗哌卡因腰麻有30%的产妇麻醉镇痛效果差,需硬膜外追加局麻药。在研究中发现,当罗哌卡因用量逐渐增加,其感觉阻滞的起效时间及阻滞扩散范围几乎不受局麻药用量的影响,与Brockway等[5]和Wolff等[6]报道罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉的试验结果相似,同时他们还发现随罗哌卡因用量的增加,运动和感觉阻滞的持续时间随之延长,运动阻滞的程度也增加。 在循环系统影响方面,四组产妇腰麻后各观察时间段平均动脉压较麻醉前有显著下降,这可能与罗哌卡因和布比卡因对Aδ和C类纤维有更强阻滞效能,充分阻滞交感神经密切相关[7]。经加快输液,给予适量麻黄素等对症处理后效果良好。 在胎儿影响方面,麻醉前后四组产妇的胎儿心率无病理性变化;新生儿Apgar 1min,5min评分为8-10分,未发现对新生儿有不良影响。 |
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
在不良反应方面,心动过缓与低血压常同时发生,给予麻黄素10mg-30mg治疗后,血压回升,心率恢复。罗哌卡因组低血压和心动过缓的发生率与布比卡因组相似,但罗哌卡因组恶心呕吐的发生率随局麻药剂量增加而升高;各组均未发现术后头痛,可能是采用了笔尖型带侧孔腰麻穿刺针,此类穿刺针与传统的锐头穿刺针相比,穿刺时是钝性分开,而后者是切断硬膜纤维,故减少了腰麻后的头痛发生率[8]。 在腰-硬联合麻醉下行剖宫产术,12mg、15mg罗哌卡因与10mg布比卡因的麻醉效能相似;罗哌卡因腰麻下感觉阻滞起效时间和扩散范围不受局麻药用量影响。 1. Feldman HS, Covino BG. Comparative motorblocking effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, a new amino amide local anesthetic, in the rat and dog. Anesth Analg, 1988, 67: 1047-1052. 2. Santos AC, Arthur GR, Roberts DJ, et al. Effect of ropivacaine and bupivacaine on uterine blood flow in pregnant ewes. Anesth Analg, 1992, 74: 62-67. 3. Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D,et al. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg, 1989, 69:563. 4. Bader AM,Datta S, Flanagan H, et al. Comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine induced conduction blockade in the isolated rabbit vagus nerve. Anesth Analg, 1989, 68:724. 5. Brockway MS, Bannister J, Mcclure JH, et al. Comparison of extradural ropivacaine and bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth, 1991, 66: 31-37. 6. Wolff AP, Hasselstrom L, Kerkkamp HE, et al. Extradural ropivacaine and bupivacaine in hip surgery. Br J Anaesth, 1995, 74: 458-460. 7. Rosemberg PH, Heinonen E. Differential sensitivity of A and C fibers to long-acting amide local anesthesia. Br J Anaesth, 1983, 55:163. 8. 王俊科等译,临床麻醉手册,第五版.辽宁科学技术出版社,193. |